Talk:Supply chain finance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge "Reverse Factoring" and "Global supply chain finance"

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge Reverse factoring and Global supply chain finance into Supply chain finance on the grounds that these are not distinct topics. Klbrain (talk) 16:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some looking for sources about Global supply chain finance online. As far as I can see it isn't a separate thing:

The article is all about supply chain finance, which is the same as reverse factoring.
The "Global" bit seems to only appear in the name of a company/organization called "Global supply chain finance"
The article tried to disambiguate itself from reverse factoring by claiming that reverse factoring is only domestic, but most sources don't indicate this (or indeed, they imply the opposite).

I'm therefore suggesting that Global supply chain finance and reverse factoring be merged into supply chain finance. GlobalOptimum (talk) 17:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. "Global supply chain finance" is the name of a company, mentioned in passing in the article (Global supply chain finance#Global supply-chain finance solution set). There is also Global Supply Chain Finance Forum, a consortium of industry associations. Like nom, I can't see any significant difference between lowercase global supply chain finance and vanilla supply chain finance.

Merging would provide an opportunity to sort out the buzzword infestation in both articles. Narky Blert (talk) 06:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 16:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

This article strongly reads like an advert for supply chain finance, and is written obscurely. For instance, ‘Further growth potential and challenges’ includes lines like “In order for supply chain finance to take off on a broad scale, a fresh impetus is needed” and does not mention any criticisms of supply chain finance in the wake of significant industry scandals such as the collapse of Greensill Capital, which is not mentioned at all in the article. Djsua6&ng63!&& (talk) 13:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]