Talk:Suillus spraguei/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Issues

Hey again. I'm just seeing a couple little needy things, and we'll be good to go. The edibility and similar species sections are kind of skimpy, maybe some fattening up. Image caption spruce up; and another image if possible, but not necessary. If any bio/pharm etc., add that too.-- Rcej (talk) 02:02, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I expanded the edibility (chanelled my inner Français), added a blurb in the similar species, buffed some captions, and included a good closeup shot of the cap surface. Couldn't find anything to put in about bio/pharm, for this species. Let me know if there's anything else. Sasata (talk) 05:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's great! This is everything for this one, so it's a go. I like how enthused you seem about mushrooms, what with all the other things you could easily write about in your particular scientific field. Cool.-- Rcej (talk) 08:33, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Suillus spraguei passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The review process went easily and decisively, and the article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass