Talk:Suicide in China

Death: Suicide Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suicide task force (assessed as High-importance).

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Trust and Safety team maintains a list of crisis support resources.
If you see a threat of harm on Wikipedia, please follow these steps.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2019 and 23 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AnniePJordan. Peer reviewers: Heylee dooley.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from suicide in China

Should "People's Republic of China" be the name, or just "China"? Hasn't the Republic of China basically given up on conquering the mainland, and therefore the ROC should simply be termed "Taiwan" and the PRC "China"? Either this article should be merged into suicide in China or vice-versa. Tisane ^talk/_stalk 19:25, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diatribe aside, that one should be merged here.--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Foxconn#Employee_suicides_and_deaths says the rate is 22/10K Both can't be right —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.117.98.164 (talk) 18:00, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I merged the content from the other page into here. We will probably end up with estimates from NGOs differing from official Government statistics. That is not a problem so long as everything is cited from a reliable source. Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Original interpretation of Confucius and Mencius?

The section on suicide on Chinese philosophy seems to contain the editor's own reading of Confucius and Mencius' comments as possible endorsements of suicide. Is there scholarly literature that deals with this issue? Homunculus (duihua) 03:03, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As no one has responded to this in many months, and since it is an inappropriate use of a primary source, I am going to delete it. If someone would like to provide secondary source analysis on the subject of suicide in Chinese philosophy, we can revisit it. Homunculus (duihua) 05:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After one more moment's thought, this section is not appropriate here even if we had secondary sources. This page is about suicide in the modern Chinese state. Whatever views Confucius and Mencius espoused on the subject 2,500 years ago is not relevant. Homunculus (duihua) 05:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Self contradictory "Working Condition" Section

Foxconn suicide rate remained lower than that of the general Chinese population as well as all 50 states in the United States. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.174.53.133 (talk) 15:39, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Suicide in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i1FL2q8ZO_Z93-mOqOx5eSYQW36Q?docId=CNG.fe11c1b55d60e484a37a458dccdd1b34.8f1&hl=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:37, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]