Talk:Sudurpashchim Province
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Should be merged with Far-Western Development Region, Nepal
[edit]As "Province No. 7" is just a new and temporary name for Far-Western Development Region, Nepal, it should be merged into that article. Batternut (talk) 09:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:25, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 28 May 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Sudurpashchim Pradesh → Sudurpashchim – No need to add Pradesh in the title here. ~SS49~ {talk} 13:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I too have considered this before, but having thought a bit, I would oppose at this time. Nepal district articles have "District" at the end, municipality articles have "municipality", except the well-known cities, so "Pradesh" would be consistent. Secondly, All other named provinces are named after well-known rivers: Bagmati, Gandaki and Karnali. Dropping "Pradesh" would lead to unnecessary ambiguousness in their case; so again, for consistency with other provinces, which are better off with "Pradesh" than without, I would oppose at this time, and until such time as the provinces become sufficiently and reasonably unambiguously recognisable without the appendage. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Comment Pinging @Usedtobecool: Bagmati, Karnali and Gandaki Pradeshs are not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC so Pradesh is needed in the name but this case is different. Sudurpashchim is redirected to Sudurpashchim Pradesh and it refers to Pradesh only. Only when there is need to disambiguate, municipality or rural municipality is added in the name otherwise it's better not to include municipality or rural municipality in the title. ~SS49~ {talk} 22:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- SS49, "Sudurpashchim" rarely occurs in sources without being accompanied by "Pradesh" or the English "Province". WP:NCCS provides support for the idea of maintaining consistency among administrative divisions of the same type when possible; here, it is not only possible but to be recommended, IMO. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Usedtobecool: I agree with you. ~SS49~ {talk} 10:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose On the Provincial Government website it is "Sudurpashchim Pradesh", so I think it should be same. --- 👤Raju💌 14:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Of course it should be "Sudurpashchim Pradesh". See the official web page of "Sudurpashchim Pradesh". --Janak Bhatta (talk) 11:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bagmati Pradesh which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:32, 5 January 2022 (UTC)