Talk:Stuttgart–Horb railway

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in Germany Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	September 22, 2019

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Rail transport in Germany task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Reorganization of articles

Our articles covering the various parts of the Gäubahn and related lines are in a somewhat confusing state and the German Wikipedia has diverged from us. I suggest the following:

merge Tübingen–Horb railway into Plochingen–Tübingen railway, and move the merged article to Plochingen–Immendingen railway line. That puts all of streckennummer 4600 in one place, and matches Bahnstrecke Plochingen–Immendingen [de].
trim Stuttgart–Hattingen railway down and move it to Stuttgart–Horb railway line. That puts all of streckennummer 4860 in one place, and matches Bahnstrecke Stuttgart–Horb [de]. Note that I've already created Tuttlingen–Hattingen railway line for the south end of this line.
create a brief overview article at Gäubahn (?) to cover the concept, which incorporates parts of both lines but isn't managed as a single railway line.

Pinging Grahamec as a major contributor in this area. Mackensen (talk) 11:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No doubt better than the current mess, which is inherited from earlier German articles.--Grahame (talk) 03:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]