Talk:Stony Crossing railway line

Australia: New South Wales / Victoria / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Stony Crossing railway line is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article establishment

Hi, I created this page recently, but wikipedia tells me that its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. I don't understand because each paragraph is referenced. Also, wikipedia tells me that the topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Again, I don't understand because this page is referenced by several other pages, so there is a role for this page. Aj 0013 (talk) 09:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are perfectly entitled to remove these tags if you consider issues have been addressed. We are all equal here (so it is one of us who placed the tag) and it would have been placed by a new article patroller as a guide. Don't remove deletion discussion tags, but removing others OK, after a few days as a courtesy, perhaps. Crusoe8181 (talk) 08:52, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm new to wikipedia and learning how it all works! Aj 0013 (talk) 09:35, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]