Jump to content

Talk:Steven Wilson discography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

TOWN EDDY! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.237.197 (talk) 03:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone chopped a chunk out of the porcupine tree section

[edit]

Someone chopped a chunk out of the porcupine tree section. It jumps from the 1st cd release to the 5th (Up The Downstair, The Sky Moves Sideways, Signify, and the associated side albums from that period are all missing). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.131.138 (talk) 23:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not that someone took it out, It's just that someone only put in the first two, and then I've been working on adding more too it, but I've been adding the more recent ones in first. (Just because I'm more familiar with those albums.) I'll eventually get around to adding all of them...(or someone will beat me to it.) Sergecross73 msg me 00:51, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The "main Porcupine Tree albums according to you" is not suitable for a rationale use of Wikipedia. Please, read Wikipedia:NPOV before performing such edit again. We focus on albums released by Steven Wilson under its own name or outside Porcupine Tree, or those that are not mentioned in other articles. No need to repeat the entire Porcupine Tree discography here. Synesthetize (talk) 06:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please, take the time to read what I'm saying. I'm not trying to push POV here. It's that I'm not that great with charts and haven't added the rest of their albums on there. I'm not claiming ones more important than another, I'm claiming I haven't gotten around to completing it and no one else ever even comes around except you every couple of weeks who just reverts it away altogether.
While I don't agree with your approach, I can understand what you're saying with the exception of deleting the link to Porcupine Tree's discography section. What's your rationale behind that? Sergecross73 msg me 11:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't remember to have removed that link. If I did it was a mistake and I apologize for that. Anyway, it's solved. Synesthetize (talk) 13:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You removed it in this edit. It didn' use the "main article" template thing, but the link was still there until you removed it in that edit. Sergecross73 msg me 17:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About the Blackfield section

[edit]

Actually, Blackfield have their discography section on their main article (which had a link to it here before someone cut it out), it's not necessary to repeat it here. With that criterion, we should also list all the No-Man and Bass Communion albums that are already on each band pages. Synesthetize (talk) 06:12, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Under this philosophy, shouldn't we remove those final 3 Porcupine Tree albums off of it as well? They too are already mentioned in the Porcupine Tree discography. See? Sergecross73 msg me 17:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The reason is that they're not actually Porcupine Tree albums, it is just Steven Wilson in studio who used 'Porcupine Tree' as a pseudonymous at that point. The explanation is at the header of the section. Nevertheless, there isn't any obliged need for them to be listed since the solely text explaining it could be enough. They may be removed if there is a consensus about it. Synesthetize (talk) 21:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Steven Wilson discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]