Talk:St. Patrick High School (Chicago)

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Water Polo State Titles

The current set up lists top-4 finishes for the school in IHSA State Series. For sports (like water polo) that had state titles prior to the IHSA sponsoring a state championship, this must be listed separately, and must have a proper reliable source supporting it, per wikipedia's verifiability policy. Best of luck and happy editing! LonelyBeacon (talk) 01:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notable alumni

Before adding or re-adding any people to this list. Please consult:

In short: alumni should not be listed unless they meet Wikipedia's notability guideline. That is, they are the subject of an article, or are eligible for an article. Note: local business people generally are not notable. Further, these alumni should not be listed unless there is a third part reliable source that confirms they attended the school. LonelyBeacon (talk) 22:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on addition of non-notable alumni

An anon editor has been repeatedly adding an alum to the list of notable alumni. The individual alum is not only a red link, but pretty clearly does not meet WP:GNG. Per the Schools Project Guideline on alumni, alumni should only be listed if they meet the general notability guideline. This guideline is an extension of the guidelines on lists of people which states that lists of people should generally be restricted to people who meet the notability requirement.

Further, all alumni require a reliable source to confirm that they not only exist, but were in fact alumni. No such reference has ever been offered. What has been offered is a link to a business website that does not even mention the alum in question, let alone that they attended the school. As far as I am concerned, this reeks of WP:NOT#ADVERTISING.

I would like any editor to comment on this issue below, whether in support of or against inclusion of this alum. LonelyBeacon (talk) 22:41, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support LonelyBeacon. It's essential to include only notable men, because without that rule anyone can add himself and his friends and relations and the page will just be clogged with unencyclopedic trivia. By the way, I found three you were missing. Moonraker (talk) 02:46, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support LonelyBeacon: The point of these notable people lists is to connect articles that have something in common that wouldn't otherwise be connected. Too often, editors believe that notable means "successful" and include lots of alumni who have been successful in life, but not necessarily notable as defined on Wikipedia. And just because reliable sources can be obtained on an individual does not automatically confer notability; those sources merely confirm the person's existence. An important thing to understand too is that school articles are not property of the school; they are Wikipedia articles about the school, so someone being notable locally or a "staple to the community" is pretty irrelevant for the article here since it's not geared towards the audience of just that community. In this case, said alum does not meet the threshold of notability and thus should not be mentioned in the notable alumni list. --JonRidinger (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on St. Patrick High School (Chicago). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on St. Patrick High School (Chicago). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Mike Bailey coaching.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with recent additions

Here are the issues I have with TheDonsAreTrash recent edits.

1. Claims stating the school is the oldest...are sourced to the school which is not a Reliable Source

2. The third paragraph under history is entirely unsourced.

3. How promotional can we get with "academics at St. Patrick are very diverse and strong" this is Peacock and promotional. The rest of that paragraph and the next are more suitable for the school's website and look at that it is sourced to the schools website.

4. "Program for Advanced College Credit" section is completely promotional and is more suitable for the school's website, and again look at what it is referenced to. 5. "Drug Testing Program" again wikipedia is not a webhost, and again this is referenced to the schools website.

6. "Known through Chicago and Illinois as an iconic"...how much more peacock can you get.

7. It was "shocking win" - not encylopedic

8. "Prestigious" is most often a peacock

9. The rest of the sports section the way the it is in this edit is not encylopedic, this includes the soccer section which is also unsourced.

10. The addition of to "Notable" alumni who are not notable according to Wikipedia guidelines. I have suggested the editor write the articles first and submit to determine if these individuals are notable enough to be included in Wikipedia.

This article should be reverted back to the best historical version that is not promotional. Thank you --VViking_TalkEdits 13:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]