Talk:St. Charles Bay/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   The McAlister reference needs its capitalization fixed and a place of publication provided. Where was Sorrells published?

Fixed.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   The sentence about the Karankawa Indians defending the settlers is out of sequence chronologically.

Removed. Not essential to the bay.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

1. B. Focused:

   The Union bombardment did more than just stall Lamar's development. Describe what actually happened. Don't think that the Reserve at St. Charles Bay is notable.

Added more detail.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

1. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

2. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

3. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Needs a map, badly. In fact a map is essential.

Will add a map shortly.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Map added.--William S. Saturn (talk) 07:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

1. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Thank you for the review on such short notice.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)