Jump to content

Talk:St. Charles Bay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSt. Charles Bay has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 29, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 13, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a Spanish vessel blown into Texas' Saint Charles Bay by a storm, was allegedly stranded in a creek and later taken apart to construct houses?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:St. Charles Bay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    The McAlister reference needs its capitalization fixed and a place of publication provided. Where was Sorrells published?
Fixed.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  2. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    The sentence about the Karankawa Indians defending the settlers is out of sequence chronologically.
Removed. Not essential to the bay.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. B. Focused:
    The Union bombardment did more than just stall Lamar's development. Describe what actually happened. Don't think that the Reserve at St. Charles Bay is notable.
Added more detail.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  2. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  3. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Needs a map, badly. In fact a map is essential.
Will add a map shortly.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Map added.--William S. Saturn (talk) 07:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
Thank you for the review on such short notice.--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on St. Charles Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]