Jump to content

Talk:Spyridon Marinatos/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cplakidas (talk · contribs) 21:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will take this on in the following days. Constantine 21:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Lede
Early career and education
First directorate, professorship and Messenia
Politics
Assessment and legacy

That's it for a first pass. The article is the usual thorough work, an interesting and well-written read that captures the life and work of its subject very well. Constantine 10:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks as ever, Constantine -- all looks very sensible. Will get through over the next couple of days. UndercoverClassicist T·C 11:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly sorted now: just a few where I need to find citations. UndercoverClassicist T·C 17:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cplakidas: All done now, I think. One semi-done on Kordatos and Metaxas: a hand here would be appreciated. UndercoverClassicist T·C 20:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I had another read-through, my comments have been addressed, and I cannot find anything more to nit-pick about. As stated, an excellent piece of work, well above the usual GA standard. I will pass it now. Constantine 17:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.