Talk:Space Hop
Appearance
This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 14 February 2021. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]@Piotrus: @Guinness323: I don't see the notability of this yet. Ref 1 is non-reliable, whereas there's no info on whether the 2nd ref count towards SIGCOV. Pinging Piotrus and Guinness323. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 07:09, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: Indeed, I can't find what makes "SahmReviews" reliable, it seems like a blog. No editorial policy I can find, the only about I see is "As an Amazon Associate, SahmReviews earns from qualifying purchases." Reading the review, it's not bad per se, but again, we tend to dismiss blogs. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Space Hop was marketed as an educational science classroom game, (as opposed to a family game), and so most reviews appeared in educational magazines. As such, it was fairly widely reviewed by educators in 1977-80, I have included a few of them as samples. Guinness323 (talk) 03:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC)