Talk:Southend High School for Boys

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

School Song

I put up a section on the school song, but it was removed; I see no reason why it is necessary to remove this useful information: it is a long tradition of the school, and almost impossible to locate anywhere else on the internet. It is only mentioned in passing in the rest of the article, and surely deserves more. Haltri (talk) 16:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

I have attempted to clean up the mess into which this page had descended. Many of the so-called "facts" were unworthy of a place on Wikipedia. The entire section on courses available at the school was not only distracting to the main point of the page, but also would appear to have been a clear breach of copyright. Any future editing by others, particularly those with links to the school, should comply with the Wikipedia guidelines. Bencherlite 19:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Factual Vs Fictional

I can confirm that the majority of 'Trivial' facts on this article are correct. There are of course a few minor comments that are both childish and not acceptable under the Guidelines laid out by Wikipedia and shall be deleted. Please do not let the iron-fist ruling of some editors effect your decision to add any interesting anecdotes or trivia facts as long as they are 100% truthful. As a member of the teaching staff at SHSB i am in a position to know which facts are correct and acceptable for broadcast. Thank you. 20:36 12/02/07 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SouthendTeachers (talk • contribs) 20:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Please see the article on original research for why these trivia should not be included here unless they can be independently confirmed through citation of verifiable primary sources. --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 20:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page was re-edited to meet your demands laid out in the guidelines of correct trivial facts and therefore you deleted a lot of what you claimed to be acceptable, read it next time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steven Knowledge (talk • contribs) 20:47, 12 February 2007

Do you have any citations for any of the trivia you insist on adding to the article? --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 20:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking talk pages

Please don't blank this talk page. It is a necessary part of discussion on what the underlying article should contain, and it is important as a record of any past discussions that have taken place. --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 20:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why does anyone doubt the truth of anything written there? It's obviously written by a pupil, and in the end, pupils constitue the main function of the school!

Even if some of the "trivia" comments are true, they do not belong on Wikipedia, for reasons that have already been explained. Wikipedia articles are not the place for pupils' "in-jokes" either. If vandalistic changes continue being made to this article, then those responsible are likely to be blocked by administrators. Bencherlite 10:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki policy

I don't see why information on the school's attitude towards Wikipedia should be deleted - it is as much accurate and interesting information as anything else. Puretide 13:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Provide a verifiable reference for it then. --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 20:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ask a pupil! Puretide 15:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would constitute original research. An independent verifiable source is required. --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 16:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the info on this page is not verified - as a member of the school I think I can comment on it.Puretide 18:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good call. I've therefore removed a sizable chunk of fully uncited information (which, I might add, was of questionable import). By the way, it doesn't matter if you're a student, a teacher, the headmaster, or just some random guy. Wikipedia does not accept original research, including claims that "I was there yesterday and I saw it myself". You have to provide a source that other people can reference and therefore independently verify the statements that you add to an article. --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 20:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remember, you'll need to provide a source in order to keep that material. Otherwise, it counts as original research, which isn't permitted on Wikipedia. Please take the time to read and understand the policies before making further edits to this article. --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 21:03, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please may I point out that some of the information is highly relevent such as modifications of the headmaster recently becoming a Dr. as opposed to a Mr. which people seem to want to delete?

Please may i also note that it is also of importance to list the previous headmaster seeing that they ran the school for 19 years and has only just retired - it is useful information about the school. Name prefixes and suffixes are also not a problem.

None of this violates a rule and is backed up by recognised certificates and plaques within the school itself! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.174.92 (talk) 20:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Southend High School for Boys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Southend High School for Boys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]