Talk:South Sydney High School

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Sydney / Education Low‑importance

	Australia portal South Sydney High School is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that an image or photograph of South Sydney High School be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Changes Since Fitzpatrick's Appointment

This whole paragraph is not notable -- I'll remove the paragraph within a week if there are no objections Australian Matt 14:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bold edits

There have been several large edits occurring on this page, using wasteful grammar and removing links to other pages. Please do not do such edits without first discussing the necessity for such changes. I would like to refer all editors to:Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Cheers Stravin (talk) 04:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but there is nothing to discuss here in my humble opinion. Your changes to the article make no sense. Please read WP:OWN and move on for copy editing. Ottre 05:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

my arguments have at least some merit. I quote: "Since working on an article does not entitle you to "own" the article, it is still important to respect the work of your fellow contributors. When making large scale removals of content, particularly content contributed by one editor, it is important to consider whether a desirable result could be obtained by working with the editor, instead of against him or her—regardless of whether or not he or she "owns" the article."

therefore we should find a compromise that does not damage the fabric of the article. Thanks Stravin (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Community consensus:

~~Is there a reference to show that the government does not provide funding?~~
The colours are still Green, Red, and Yellow? Or was that vandalism?
If the school was founded for boys, why remove the word "today"? I suggest a second sentence.
The second paragraph is awkward. The tree planting sentence, in particular. Involves at least two independent clauses. Do you know what type of trees have survived?
Can you get a photograph of said front lawn?

Ottre 16:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)