Talk:South East Hampshire Bus Rapid Transit
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Requested move 15 March 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Participants were unconvinced that the proposed title is the WP:COMMONNAME. (non-admin closure) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
South East Hampshire Bus Rapid Transit → Eclipse Busway – The official name used by the Hampshire County Council to address this route is called the Eclipse Busway and not "South East Hampshire Bus Rapid Transit".
See link from the council here that shows it's real name: https://www.hants.gov.uk/transport/transportschemes/brtphaseII Other sources such as from the CBW magazine, construction site and BBC news show this name clearly.
Only thing I can find which relates to the page name is this website, however it is a transport scheme and not a BRT: https://www.sehrt.org.uk/ - NHPluto (talk) 09:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 17:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. 〜Festucalex • talk • contribs 09:35, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- The South East Hampshire Bus Rapid Transit name is used in various forms in accordance to sources:
- Portsmouth City Council (South East Hampshire Rapid Transit)
- Greener Vision (South East Hampshire BRT)
- My Journey Portsmouth (South East Hampshire Rapid Transit)
- RouteOne (South-East Hampshire BRT)
- Grandtubetrains (talk) 12:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:OFFICIAL - there might be other good reasons to move the page but the reason given is not sufficient. WaggersTALK 11:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. It has been argued that the proposed name is used in primary sources. But that shows little if anything about the common name. (It's a worry that the article gives ten references and they all seem to be primary sources too.) Andrewa (talk) 16:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Hampshire has been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 17:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Leaning oppose, per absence of sufficient evidence of a change in common name. BD2412 T 00:11, 3 April 2023 (UTC)