Talk:Soul Food Taqueria

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soul Food Taqueria article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Soul Food Taqueria has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 27, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip-hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soul Food Taqueria/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. The article reads very well. I have only a few comments, which I will list below. I may add comments later. (I fixed some punctuation throughout your article. See MoS: Quotation marks - Inside or out. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"Despite little or no considerable amount of commercial success,..." - think you perhaps meant to leave out "considerable amount of"?
"Most of the instrumentation during recording was employed by Guerrero,..." - needs rewording
"The musical style of Soul Food Taqueria has been noted by music writers as taking inspiration from the..." - maybe not be grammatically incorrect, but is clumsy and could be improved. e.g. Music writers noted that the musical style of Soul Food Taqueria was inspired by...." or words you prefer.
wikilinks needing disambig: Baja, Vibe, Jupiter
Two Non-fair use images of the cover are not justified in the article. See Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria.

Article placed on hold for now. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed

I edited the article. What do you mean by the last comment? Dan56 (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean the question of whether the fair use of both the front and back covers are justified? What is your justification for using both? —Mattisse (Talk) 02:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for the opinion of other GAN reviewers regarding the use of the front and back album covers. They felt the use of both covers was unwarranted without extensive discussion of the specific covers.[1] Therefore, if you keep both covers the article will violate Wikipedia:NFCC#3a and Wikipedia:NFCC#8 of the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria and therefore fail GAN. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They support the artwork section of the article. Dan56 (talk) 20:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have a uncited quotation: "So what is a soul food taquería? Do you get a side of collard greens with your menudo?"
I have asked for a second opinion twice on this issue. The last one confirmed that two fair use images are a violation of the fair use rules.[2] Therefore, if you insist on retaining two images of the album cover, I will have to fail the article.

—Mattisse (Talk) 01:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My fault

I fixed it up good. Dan56 (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding Wikipedia's position regarding copyrights. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on subject
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Another good article. Congradulations! —Mattisse (Talk) 15:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Soul Food Taqueria/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on subject
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Last edited at 21:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 06:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Soul Food Taqueria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]