Talk:Souhegan High School

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Souhegan High School article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: New Hampshire Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Editing

Edited Sunday, September 3rd, 2006 by Qriz: Did some grammar/spelling editing and removed the phrases about graduates commenting on it being "the most amazing 4 years of their life" and such. It sounded self-centered and was probably not based on any real data.

March 2007

Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, as it has recently been editted, then I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of stub on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Low on this importance scale.

My reasoning is as follows: This article is minimal at present so it is obviously a stub.... more may reveal an upgrade to its importance. Hope this helps Victuallers 19:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JRP & Senior project

Please build a section for the JRP & Senior project and try to clean up this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.68.58.67 (talk) 23:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enrollment & Staff

Hi, I have noticed that the enrollment information on Wikipedia is inconsistent. Someone needs to find out what the real numbers are because the information in the artcile is contradictory and seems to be different every time I visit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lifelonglego (talk • contribs) 19:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

I am assessing this article for WikiProject Schools following a request. Firstly, I maintaining the current low-importance rating since there is not sufficient evidence for higher importance. This article is clearly no longer a stub, so I'm upping the quality rating to start-class, however significant further work is needed before a higher rating than this can be justified.

The content of the article firstly needs a significant clean-up and review. The article sections should be re-formatted to fit better into the standard for school articles - see WP:WPSCH/AG#S. Significant parts of the content, particularly "Operations" onwards, are not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Examples include mission statements and excessive information only of interest to staff or students e.g. discipline statistics. Project consensus has determined in detail what content should not be included in a school article, and the full list can be found at WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI.

While it is good to have some references, significantly more are needed, and large parts of the article are completely unsourced. One section that is referenced, the history section, should use citation templates when possible, and I would advise against using ibid with the Wikipedia referencing system allowing reference order to easily change. Any section about controversy should be well referenced and cite sources from both sides of the issue with appropriate weight - the "Security controversy" section doesn't do this presently.

Finally, I would suggest lightning up the page if possible. It is standard practice to have the school logo in the infobox, usually uploaded as non-free content. Furthermore, if possible, someone should take some pictures of the school (with a camera; not just taken off random websites) and upload them to Wikimedia Commons for use in the article. CT Cooper · talk 18:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Significant portions and sections of this page have been deleted within the last year (2019-2020). There were extensive sections that described the high school history that were deleted. These should be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wutzu9 (talk • contribs) 16:56, January 24, 2021 (UTC)

See [1] for this user's post about this on my talk page, and my reply [2] explaining WP:COI and WP:OWN, and pointing to WP:POLITICIAN. Meters (talk) 17:43, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]