Talk:Solar power in Massachusetts

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.

Updating data

The most recent data in the article seems to be from 2012 to 2013. This article needs to be updated. MaynardClark (talk) 18:34, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Math errors?

"Massachusetts has the potential for generating 799,344 million kWh/year (799.3 TWh/y) from 184,076 MW (0.184 TW) of offshore wind farms and 82,205 million kWh (82.2 TWh) from 51,568 MW (0.052 TW) of photovoltaic solar farms, and 26,000 million kWh (26 TWh) (47% of consumption) from 22,500 MW (0.023 TW) of rooftop photovoltaics."

0.184TW + 82.2TWh + 0.052TW + 26TWh != 799.3TWh/y

The units are all different, maybe when multiplying them by solar hours and other unnamed values that adds up?

I tried looking up the first few of those number in the citations and didn't find any of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skintigh (talk • contribs) 19:25, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]