Talk:Solar apex
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
|
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. | |
Religious & Empirical Significance
[edit]Where the hell is this Surah Ya-Sin passage coming from? Can a citation be provided for this information or is this based on opinion. The vagueness of the quote in question doesn't lend itself necessarily to the theory stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.190.59.178 (talk) 05:19, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- This is astrological nonsense and should be deleted from this article. 65.215.33.194 (talk) 19:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Coordinates
[edit]This cites what appear to be precise-coordinate conversions of imprecise coordinates that would indicate a rather rough determination. If so, good science demands that this be made clear. 74.69.160.254 (talk) 17:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
There does not seem to be any reliable reference for "solar apex". The only paper that mentions the term is the 1980 Hoskin, Michael paper.
The article should have a source for the definition (Hoskin would work) and the direction. As it is we have some editors making claims by combining data from sources: that is synthesis right? Johnjbarton (talk) 20:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Location
[edit]According to your star map, the little dot is in Lyra, and much closer to the main part of Lyra than to the main part of Hercules. The maps are much easier to read with "invert color", that is: white sky with black stars. That is the most common way that star maps are published. You should also provide that type so that viewers do not have to do their own conversions. Viewers that need to print the maps need to have the white sky versions. If you feel that only one type should be here, then get rid of the black sky/white star versions. agb 173.233.167.51 (talk) 18:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC)