Talk:Soaring Stones/Archive 1

Source

This faculty member's profile mentions the sculpture, but I don't think it is worth incorporating into the article. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2007 sculptures?

Should this article be included in Category:2007 sculptures? It was first installed in Portland, but was later installed under a slightly different name in Washington in 2007. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 03:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, it's not a 2007 work; even though the piece was re-installed slightly differently and re-titled, it's still ostensibly the same materials arranged in the same way, and doesn't constitute a newer work. Unless it's significantly different to the original and a reliable source describes it as a 2007 work, I think it's still a 1990 work. Just my 2d worth. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Baffle gab1978: This is very helpful, thank you. I won't add the category unless others advocate otherwise. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soaring Stones/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 06:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written:

The article's prose and layout are compliant with guidelines. I found no grammatical issues either. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article's content adheres to a variety of reliable sources; no original research, and appropriately frequent citations. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

It looks as though all relevant aspects of the topic have been covered herein. None of the included information comes across as trivial. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:37, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

There is no sense of bias in the article's tone. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

The article has not been subjected to any editing disputes since at least last April, according to the immediate revision history. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

The sole image used in the article serves a relevant illustrative purpose, and is appropriately licensed for its usage. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Upon reading over this article, I am convinced it satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:37, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your time and assistance. Much appreciated! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:38, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.