Jump to content

Talk:Snallygaster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

At *thefreedictionary.com/snollygoster it suggests that an origin for this term might be the Pennsylvania Dutch schnelle geeschter. I understand this is a German variant, so the etymology is similar; can anyone comment?

I've also come across snoligoster, which might be related.

Number774 22:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Snallygaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update/RS for Fallout 76

[edit]

Fallout 76 has been released, so the mention of it here should be in the present tense now. And we should support the snallygaster's appearance in that game with a reliable source. This story would appear to do so - but its inaccessible for me (I'm only seeing its preview in Google) due to its GDPR concerns. I'd appreciate it if someone outside the EU could verify that the story does indeed support the claim, and if so add it as a reference to that section of this article. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 22:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Irrelevant gibberish

uhrggfuihgyfgvsdygsduiheygbesbhgdfbgyisgumdfgds89fshgfsgnu9fghdfghudfhgdfuih80frhgruihru9ghdrgbdf8ughdfuggdfiugudfhgudfhgu9dfhgdtijghb9dghui5htr0jhriuhg9dr0jghrsuihhg 2603:6000:AB02:86F7:808B:7A45:36B:B4D3 (talk) 22:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21st century history?

[edit]

The subsection purportedly about the 21st century history of the article subject is instead a largely unsourced dumping ground for irrelevant pop culture references. I have renamed the section accordingly and placed the ipc template. 2603:9001:4500:1C09:B8DD:2EE2:A225:7D9B (talk) 16:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]