Jump to content

Talk:Slug and Lettuce/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Greatuser (talk · contribs) Starting review and will comment soon 15:28, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Non-reviewer comment: article doesn't seem to meet good article criteria. I have added some points below.

:*"Slug & Lettuce" -> "Slug and Lettuce", the name of the chain. :*Paragraph finishing with "leaving it with only one location in Scotland, and no presence in Wales" needs to finish with a ref.

  • "The chain refreshes its menu twice a year, once for spring/summer and once for autumn/winter" - ref?
This statement is not a direct quotation, statistic, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statement that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or contentious material relating to living persons; therefore, according to the Good Article criteria, it does not require a reference. Farrtj (talk) 11:24, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Articles should always be fully sourced, and I will not permit anyone to pass this unless it is referenced. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In response to this I have removed the offending sentences.Farrtj (talk) 22:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Most outlets are situated in town and city centre locations" - ref?
As before.Farrtj (talk) 11:24, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See above. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • All paragraphs in the Operations section are too short and need to be merged with others.
  • In the article, explain the reason why the quote by Zoe Williams is needed or how it is relevant, not just have an unexplained quote.
  • Merge short paragraphs in the Reception section with others.
  • "the South East" -> "South East England"

Review list

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: