Talk:Skipping Girl Sign

Skipping Girl Sign was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 18, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Australia: Melbourne Low‑importance

	Australia portal Skipping Girl Sign is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Pop culture reference

There's a Melbourne band who call themselves 'Skipping Girl Vinegar', it might be worth mentioning (depends if they're regarded as being notable enough) 121.45.7.148 20:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The band "Skipping Girl Vinegar" is most definately worth mentioning! I don't know enough about them to write a whole page but I think someone definately should! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.41.154 (talk) 03:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Skipping Girl Vinegar (The Band) are awesome. They should definitely have their own page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.110.3.109 (talk) 12:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone seen any more references to the Crusader Plate company? There seems to be no information about them other than this odd bit of restoration. 220.240.42.121 (talk) 12:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Skipping Girl Sign/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 12:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this in several steps. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Considering how much expansion this article needs, it would be a waste to go through this for now
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Needs access dates, at the very least
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Referencing is not up to par; several sections have no references
	2c. it contains no original research.	Unable to be checked until referencing is improved
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	I agree with the current start classification, as much more information could be found on the sign.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Fine
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Fine
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Fine
	7+. .	Pending

Needs major work before promotion. Holding for one week. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Failed due to lack of response and huge amounts of work needed. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What company was it originally advertising for?

We can all see it was used to sell vinegar. But for which company and does that brand exist any more? 58.179.139.206 (talk) 11:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]