Talk:Skhul Cave
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Skhul Cave article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This Cave is now part of World Heritage Site see here. Hanay (talk) 08:43, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
please add map
[edit]Please add a map with a mark. Thanks!
Title looks wrong
[edit]Please add a hyphen: Es-Skhul. In Garrod's time this might have been not required, but now it's the norm. Alternatively, and better, leave out the article altogether, so Skhul, since the common way to refer to the famous skull finds is simply Skhul and Qafzeh. The full Arabic name is 'Mugharet es-Skhul' and in that context the article is required, but not in a common English-language encyclopedic article. Arminden (talk) 14:27, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- I think this should be moved to Skhul Cave. It's the most common form in English and is listed that way at UNESCO [1].Fraenir (talk) 04:35, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Agree All the best Wikirictor 07:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Israel-related articles
- Low-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- Start-Class Archaeology articles
- Low-importance Archaeology articles
- Start-Class Geology articles
- Low-importance Geology articles
- Low-importance Start-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- Start-Class Caves articles
- Unknown-importance Caves articles
- WikiProject Caves articles