Talk:Sivanandi Rajadurai

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sivanandi Rajadurai article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

India: Tamil Nadu Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article about an Indian scientist is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) The information provided are backed up with cross references. We intent to fix any promotional words and adjectives. I appreciate any suggestions. --Mzqerd001 (talk) 11:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article is overly promotional. I have removed the most egregiously promotional stuff, but the article still needs a lot of editing and cleanup and somebody should check the references. --Randykitty (talk) 18:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the tips to improve the article. Further systematic checking of the references and corrections will be incorporated to maintain the neutrality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzqerd001 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As the intricate scientific details are removed, the overly detailed tag is removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzqerd001 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article is edited without promotional information. Checked all the references. Corrections made. No dispute on neutrality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzqerd001 (talk • contribs) 10:48, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Corrections made, neutrality of the article maintained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzqerd001 (talk • contribs) 10:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Request to remove the neutrality dispute tag: as the article is improved with systematic checking of the references and providing corrections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzqerd001 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Our understanding was to give the author's thrust research areas with references for readers to take advantage. If it is not acceptable, we request to insert the one line publication as in the earlier version (14 October 2015).Mzqerd001 (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Neutrality Tag

Corrections made, neutrality of the article maintained. The neutrality template has been staying in the article for a long time without any discussion. In the absence of any discussion, we request to remove the Neutrality template in the article.Mzqerd001 (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality of the article is maintained. As the conditions are met, i.e: absence of any discussion, neutrality tag has been removed. Mzqerd001 (talk) 09:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]