Talk:Single-track railway

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

Page title

Would it be better to move this to Single track railway, or maybe Single track (rail), and use Single track as a disambiguation page? That would help avoid confusion with Single track road. Blisco 19:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous Information

" Single track is significantly cheaper to build, though it has operational disadvantages. If the single-track section is say 15 minutes long, the line would have capacity for only two trains per hour in each direction. Double track can allow up to 15 trains per hour in each direction if signal boxes are four minutes apart. This hindrance on the capacity of a single track may be partly overcome by making the track one-way on alternate days, if the single track is not used for public transit. "

It is limited to 2 trains per hour if you try to run trains in opposite directions at 15 minute intervals. If signal boxes are 4 minutes apart, you can run 4 (or maybe 5?) trains in one direction in half an hour and then run another 4 (or 5?) in the opposite direction in the other half-hour.

I have no idea how to edit the para quoted to reflect that possibility. -- SGBailey (talk) 09:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]