Talk:Single-fire process

Crazing

Not only are the following two statements unsupported by citations but, putting in bluntly, they are wrong:

"The dual-fire, or two-fire, process made ceramics susceptible to crazing"
"Crazing was unavoidable"

Any comments before I delete?

ThanxTheriac 19:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you delete it straight away? It was absolute tosh. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.252.187 (talk) 18:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Qing Dynasty References

This article consists almost completely of facts an opinions relating to the Qing dynasty and not to pottery. If someone were interested, they should clean up all info about Qing and keep it only to one reference to the time period for purpose of the historical accuracy of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.43.193 (talk) 02:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

<SIGH> This is basicly a dead article that if not improved that should be deleted. Enfermero (talk) 22:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]