Talk:Sinfire

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sinfire article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Attribution

Text and references have been copied form Fireball Cinnamon Whisky 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:32, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The name

The trademark is SinFire Cinnamon Whisky, not Sinfire. If it changes, you need a citation and a WP:RS for that. We can't just take your word. You are also at WP:3RR and appear to be WP:Edit warring. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:20, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

We need to change the name of the article to reflect that it is now Sinfire. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, saw the help request. Given the talk page discussion as it is, I'm confused. Have the Sinfire users provided adequate proof that the name of the trademark has changed? And if so, wouldn't this be a regular page move? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO, yes. Name should be changed, as that has evidently happened at the corporate level. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okeedokes.

Done Should the lead be re-written to reflect that? Sinfire, formerly SinFire Cinnamon Whisky? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Wikipedia accounts

User:Sinfirecinnamonwhisky and User:Sinfire seem to be editing the same subject matter and pushing the same name change. By and large, if this is one user, I believe you are limited to using one account. I do not know if this is one user. I have not brought this up to a WP:Administrator yet, and bring it up so that you can address it yourself, if it needs to be addressed. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:37, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable Sources Tag Removed

Removed unreliable sources messages. All sources have been checked and derived from independent and reliable blogs and websites. Mikegabrielli (talk) 18:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mikegabrielli, what are "reliable blogs"? Are you aware of WP:UGC? Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable Sources Tag Removed

Hello! I am removing the unreliable sources messages. All sources have been checked and derived from independent and reliable blogs and websites. Thanks very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikegabrielli (talk • contribs) 17:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, you have missed the point entirely. There is still nothing that conveys any notability. Tags restored. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:09, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]