Talk:Silverstream School
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quality
[edit]Hi, This page does NOT need to be deleted as it has external links, an info box and provides overall a good explanation about what this school offers. I have no idea why it has been listed for speedy deletion as it has no flaws!! This was not intended as a promomtional page, and should not be taken as just a plain stub! (Preceding unsigned comment) User:Stewydecimalsystem 11 August 2010.
- It is not under dispute for its length: see Criterion for Speedy Deletion, G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion.
Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion. Techhead7890 (talk) 07:53, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Disputing: CSD G11
[edit]I believe this page does not classify for CSD:G11. It is not long enough that it (would) require extensive re-writing; and it does not directly (unambiguously) promote the facilities of Silverstream School. It simply points out some of the facilities available. With content additions this could become a (short) encyclopaedic article. Techhead7890 (talk) 07:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Agreeing
[edit]This article does not need re-writing and has been sufficiently changed to fit the criterion. It is only a small article, and not a promotional advert. Stewydecimalsystem (talk) 08:00, 11 August 2010 (UTC)