Talk:Shot peening of steel belts

New page for merger proposal discussion.

Is it me or does this whole page sound like an advertisement for some guys new invention?

.45Colt 07:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely think it has neutrality issues, especially the introduction. I didn't feel up to trying to fix it myself, so I've added some template messages at the beginning of the article asking for help with POV, advertising language, and citations. --SongOfMyShelf (talk) 21:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but having no knowledge of the subject I feel unqualified to help. Frankly, I'm not even sure what its about, certainly needs some images. There was once a proposal to merge to Shot peening HERE, the result was inconclusive. I think that the merger should be revived but proceed with a heavily reduced volume of material. This doesn't really solve the undeveloped nature of the article but if it were more concise and set in the context of peening generally, it might attract some editing. E x nihil ^(talk) : Ex nihil (talk) 16:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, it is in fact a thing. This is out of my range to evaluate, but the article definitely handles very little to no cited information. Cloudbongee (talk) 03:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Where is the sentence that doesn’t indicate the source? Balogal (talk) 08:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]