Jump to content

Talk:Shah Budak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Shah Budak/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Aintabli (talk · contribs) 02:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 14:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Prose review

[edit]

Image review

[edit]

No images

Source review

[edit]
  • All sources look to be reliable.
  • No close paraphrasing detected through Earwig.

Conclusion

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Source: * Har-El, Shai (1995). Struggle for Domination in the Middle East: The Ottoman-Mamluk War, 1485-91. E.J. Brill. p. 195. ISBN 9004101802. OCLC 624096003. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Aintabli (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Aintabli (talk) 18:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Sourced in article, passed GA recently, generally well written, interesting enough, my only issue is the hook is phrased weirdly in the last half in a way that feels strangely ambiguous. "in retaliation for the same treatment his son Feyyaz received?" can you think of another way to say this? Also maybe don't mention the name of his son; possibly do "in retaliation for the same having been done to his son"? PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Alt1 ... that Shah Budak, a prince of the Anatolian Dulkadir dynasty, blinded his nephew Shahruh in retaliation for his son's similar fate? @PARAKANYAA: How does it sound now? Aintabli (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I still think that phrasing is slightly awkward, but it's better and less ambiguous. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Having two non-bolded links next to each other is discouraged by WP:DYKMOS. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alt2 ... that Shah Budak, a prince of the Dulkadir dynasty in Anatolia, blinded his nephew Shahruh in retaliation for his son's similar fate? @Jlwoodwa and PARAKANYAA: Thank you. I've fixed the issue. Aintabli (talk) 15:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]