Talk:Shadow biosphere

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Shadow biosphere is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Evolutionary biology Mid‑importance

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tree of Life Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Amino acid#Nonstandard amino acids|nonstandard amino acids]] Anchor Amino acid#Nonstandard amino acids links to a specific web page: Non-proteinogenic amino acids. The anchor (#Nonstandard amino acids) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Notability

I am removing the {{Notability|neologisms|date=July 2009}} template b/c the term has 3,000 Google hits"shadow+biosphere" and even if that's not enough, the subject of the article is definitely notable and so per Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms#Articles wrongly titled as neologisms the article should only be moved, not deleted. Nikola (talk) 09:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not just microbial

I only recently encountered the term "shadow biosphere" but from what I've been reading it potentially encompasses a wider range of theorised lifeforms than just microbes - it can include any form of life that is resident on Earth and that science doesn't currently recognise as life, either due to radically different biochemistry, or because, say, it's simply so small (or indeed so large) that it lies outside the range of sizes we are normally capable of perceiving. I'll try to dig out some refs. Quaestor23 (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Virus Warning

When I clicked on the external link for more information, I got a virus warning. --217.86.74.133 (talk) 08:46, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"While life on Earth is relatively well-studied?" Relative to what?

This seems like the fabled incomplete comparative of advertising lore. Compared to remote planets, of course life on earth is relatively well studied, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.83.142.46 (talk) 21:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptic desert varnish/life reference

Is there any evidence to back up the idea that anyone has ever claimed 'desert varnish' is (or even could be) a life-form? It is not even mentioned in the WP article on 'desert varnish'? 86.134.117.67 (talk) 16:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Artificial life

I am not sure I have got a firm grasp on the definition of a shadow biosphere. It seems like evolutionary steps displacing older ones are not what we are talking about, and that the "origin" seems really important. But isn't it so that some major steps in the evolution may involve different origins working in a low-level symbiosis? Or are these "origins" all actually descendents of the same true origin?

Can one say that human technology as it displaces most of life on earth may comprise a new major biosphere, leaving "life as we know it" as a shadow biosphere? At least taken to the extreme of an AI revolution? Even though the origin of the technology is in humanity, which again originates from the origin of all "life as we know it"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.215.250.198 (talk) 15:43, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Shadow biosphere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ribosomes

"if organisms based on RNA once existed, they might still be alive today, unnoticed because they do not contain ribosomes". This statement is surprising –ribosomes are made of RNA, so why shouldn't a RNA-based organism have them? – and so needs a reference. But the source cited leads to a 404. Maproom (talk) 07:24, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"The term was coined ... "

I looked through the cited paper. The term "shadow biosphere" doesn't appear in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A2800276 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only biochemical and molecular processes?

Not-also sub-atmoic indirects?

Id be surprised. 120.21.137.7 (talk) 05:55, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]