Talk:September 2009 Xinjiang unrest

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (21)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (291)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,052)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,474) • Stub-Class articles (6,694)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (388) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,340)

Image

HK_Sept13_protest_2.jpg was swapped back on wikimedia commons. The image copied over does not actually have the right license. Benjwong (talk) 03:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes...it looks like, while they're both from the same flickr set, the one Ohconfucius uploaded is tagged as non-commercial whereas the other one isn't. Strangely enough. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 03:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I missed the 'non-commercial' licence on the replacement image I uploaded. I just think the first image is crap, as it's of just a bunch of photographers, and could have been taken anywhere. I will remove it unless/until a better one is found. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:34, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reporters' assault

This is only a sideshow (although an important one), and I don't believe it serves any encyclopaedic purpose to have the names of all 8 (non-notable) journalists listed in the article, as WP is not the news, and not a directory. I have therefore removed them, as well as the Chinese language source made redundant in the removal. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:46, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can a few journalist be taking a beating and their names not be pointed out? The article currently list out Li Zhi who doesn't even have any ties to the event other than getting dismissed. The 3 journalists are relevant. I would understand if you said the later 5 were not as famous. Benjwong (talk) 03:53, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the names are necessary. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 03:56, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That has to be your personal opinion. Li Zhi is sipping tea in the office and getting fired. He is more important than the 3 journalists in the front line? No possible way. Benjwong (talk) 03:58, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What Li Zhi is doing now is not why he is notable. He is notable by virtue of his [former] positions. Whatever happens, I don't think the 8 journalists (in this context) will ever be notable, although the incident is notable (but fails the notability presumption in WP:N). I don't agree with the revert, but I'm not going to war over it. Let consensus prevail. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Meng Jianzhu

Always nice to read a bit of China Daily once in a while to regurgitate the slogans... Police Chief Meng Jianzhu: "The recent syringe attacks, which were premeditated, masterminded and conducted by law-breakers and instigated by ethnic separatist forces, were a continuation of the July 5 incident in the city" [1] Colipon+(Talk) 17:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

teh uighur terrorists kills the innocent chinese ppl —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjanag (talk • contribs) 17:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on September 2009 Xinjiang unrest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090923164812/http://online.wsj.com:80/article/SB125282793950406449.html? to http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125282793950406449.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]