Talk:Seongsu Bridge disaster

Seongsu Bridge disaster has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 13, 2023	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 15, 2023.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after the Seongsu Bridge collapsed (pictured) in Seoul, radiographic testing found that 110 of the 111 connections in the bridge were filled with defects?

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 21, 2023, and October 21, 2024.

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Date format

Korea (both North and South) uses dmy dates. So why does this article use mdy dates? Any issue with me fixing that? Schwede 66 17:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And may I point out that as per MOS:ORDER, the external links section is supposed to be the last one? Schwede 66 17:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66 I've fixed your MOS:ORDER concern, but Korea uses the YMD, not DMY date format (because categories in the Korean language are ordered from largest to smallest). However, MOS:DATE states that there is no way to phrase the YMD date format for general use so I used the MDY date format that I'm familiar with. This is also consistent with Wikipedia policy (WP:DATEOVER) which states that the MOS guidelines on a particular date format when the article has strong national ties only applies to English-speaking countries. In addition, because of the YMD format used in Korea, to a Korean-speaker "October 24" reads much more naturally than "24 October". :3 F4U (they/it) 23:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. No trouble. Schwede 66 03:35, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]