Talk:Semen

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Semen article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 3 months

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

Spermophagia was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 16 October 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Semen. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Medical uses for human semen was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 16 August 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Semen. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Sexology and sexuality Top‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anatomy: Microanatomy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to microanatomy.

Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change line: Cum swapping, in which a woman passes semen from her mouth into that of another woman.

To: Cum swapping, in which a person passes semen from their mouth into another persons.

REASON: the nature of the sex act is not gendered. I would leave a source, but honeslty I feel this is covererd by common knowlegde. Ryvanix (talk) 23:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: needs a WP:Reliable source. Crossroads ^-talk- 23:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Snowballing

In heterosexual couples, a woman who has performed fellatio may afterwards return the semen to her partner's mouth.

A man who receives either his own or another man's semen into his mouth, albeit from a woman's, may self-identify as straight, but the behaviour is not one that would accord with heterosexual norms. I would recommend deleting the phrase In heterosexual couples, and letting the sentence continue thus: A woman who has performed fellatio may afterwards return the semen to her partner's mouth Nuttyskin (talk) 14:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"a person" would be better 41.42.83.31 (talk) 13:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is semen cum

My friend here thinks that cum is undeveloped sperm cells 2A02:A449:AD1F:1:33BC:805D:AF1D:BDA6 (talk) 22:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your friend ponders the deep questions, send him over here Dudanotak (talk) 12:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion in Health ---> Benefits to females

"Females may benefit from absorbing seminal fluid." This section begins normally enough, because the other sections have an implication that we're talking about humans. However, it goes on to say "Such benefits include male insects transferring nutrients to females via their ejaculate; in both humans and bovines, the fluid has antiviral and antibacterial properties; and useful bacteria such as Lactobacillus have been detected in fluid transferred from birds and mammals." Dudanotak (talk) 20:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source?

"Dew was once thought to be a sort of rain that fertilized the earth and, in time, became a metaphor for semen. The Bible employs the term "dew" in this sense in such verses as Song of Solomon 5:2 and Psalm 110:3, declaring, in the latter verse, for example, that the people should follow only a king who was virile enough to be full of the "dew" of youth."

Huh? I can't find any commentaries or anything suggesting that this refers to semen, and for semen to be another term for semen makes no sense in both of these verses. — I'ma editor2022 ^{(🗣️💬 |📖📚)} 02:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although the suggestion that the king is full of semen of the youth is an interesting one, it looks to be some OR which I have removed. Semen is not mentioned in Matthew Henry's Commentary of the verses. Pabsoluterince (talk) 11:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Benefits to Females should be Benefits to Individuals

its misleading and pointless to have it be gendered 41.42.83.31 (talk) 13:29, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although the content in question could probably be improved, the source cited seems to be speaking about females specifically. The sexes are not interchangeable in biology. Crossroads ^-talk- 21:33, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]