Talk:Second Empire style

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge Second Empire architecture into Napoleon III style. Paris91 (talk) 07:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Second Empire architecture into Napoleon III style. I think that the content in the Second Empire architecture article can easily be explained in the context of Napoleon III style, and the Napoleon III style article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Second Empire architecture will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Paris91 (talk) 12:36, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move to Second Empire style

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that Napoleon III style be renamed and moved to Second Empire style.

result:
Moved per consensus garnered below. Kudos to all editors for your input, and Happy, Healthy Publishing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 21:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

Napoleon III style → Second Empire style – The nomenclature "Second Empire Style" is more common than "Napoleon III style" (which are used both in the lede), hence I believe it should be moved. The Encyclopedia Britannica uses "Second Empire Style"^[1], a quick search online shows than even typing "Napoleon III style" brings up mostly pages dedicated to "Second Empire Style", and that on Google, there are twice as many results for "Second Empire Style" than for "Napoleon III style". Additionally, the category is called Category:Second Empire architecture and all other pages that talk about this style use the "Second Empire Style" (see Second Empire architecture in Europe and Second Empire architecture in the United States and Canada. IN particular, I'd like to highlight the difference between searching Napoleon II style on Google Scholar and Second Empire style on Google Scholar . The same is true for JSTOR, with many more results and pages for SES than NIIIS. The same is also true when you search for "Napoleon III architecture" (which produces 2k results) and "Second Empire architecture" (which produced 60k results). I will be WP:BOLD, and to the move, but happy to undo it and discuss if there is opposition.

References

^ https://www.britannica.com/art/Second-Empire-style

– Eccekevin (talk) 22:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

support per wp:commonname —blindlynx (talk) 15:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Proposed name is far more common and recognisable. But don't do it yourself, let whoever closes the discussion do it. That is the process. Andrewa (talk) 08:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Saint Augustin Church Paris.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.britannica.com/art/Second-Empire-style

[1]