Talk:Seaforth railway station

Seaforth railway station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 3, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Australia: Western Australia / Perth / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Seaforth railway station is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Perth (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Seaforth railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I would expect "off-peak services" to be hyphenated.
"The station is between... The station is 22.6..." mildly repetitive.
"two side platforms. The platforms are " merge i.e. "two side platforms which are "
"long, or long enough" awkward reading.
"four car train" etc, shouldn't this be "four-car train"?
"After agitation by" what does this mean?
"known as "Woop Woop". Seaforth" this is worth a footnote to explain to non-Aus/NZ readers what that actually means.
"In 1968, high level platforms..." not keen on single-sentence paras, and this thus suggests that no significant work has been conducted on the station for more than 50 years?
- I put this as its own paragraph because it two decades after everything else. It is correct to assume that no significant work has been done for over 50 years. There would have been minor things such as repainting, new signage and the like, but nothing worth adding. They haven't even added tactile paving. Steelkamp (talk) 04:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"during peak. Between peaks" repetitive.
"stop at all stops" again, I know it's literally true but it makes for clumsy reading.
"In 2018, City of Armadale Mayor Henry Zelones said that several hundred hectares of vacant land nearby is set " odd tense, and is there any update, four years later?
- I've modified this sentence slightly. There is no update. I believe the land in question is still planned for development, but no construction has started. Steelkamp (talk) 04:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note B could use a reference.

Nothing too drastic here, so on hold. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 15:47, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed all the things you have pointed out and have replied to two of them. Steelkamp (talk) 04:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]