This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire
Previously, the article claimed that Twitter was responsible for inappropriately blocking words at a virtual paleontology conference. The article cited indicates that the conference was held on a separate platform, which was responsible for the blocked words. Twitter was only used as a platform to discuss and gather the incorrectly banned words. I made the correction, but I feel like my writing was still a bit clumsy; feel free to change it further if it doesn't read well to you.
Hmm... I find it plastered all over reddit and various social media websites, but this only gets a passing mention in press articles (i.e. "They ridiculed it for having overly strict chat filters, which they said sometimes censored innocuous words..." In Bloomberg here, ironically followed by "...yet didn’t catch acronyms such as “erp” (for “erotic role play”), and for failing to detect avatars with absurdly large genitalia or simulating sex in digital toilet stalls.") —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up?What have I done?) 11:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]