Talk:Scorigami

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 19 December 2020 by reviewer JalenFolf (talk · contribs).

American football

	American football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject American football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of American football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American footballWikipedia:WikiProject American footballTemplate:WikiProject American footballAmerican football
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Baseball Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sports

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
Requested articles (Sports)
Requested articles (Association football)
Requested articles (Association football women)
Requested articles (Motor sports)
Requested articles (Estonian sportspeople)
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup :
* Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state)
* Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.)
* Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing.
* Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Expand : Professional sports (crucial article explaining the salaried undertaking of sports)
* Sport industry (currently a sub-stub)
Photo : for pages listed in Category:Wikipedia requested images of sports and games and sub-categories.
Stubs : work on articles in Category:Sports stubs
Update : List of world sports championships
Other :
- Translate the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Wikipedia to English Wikipedia which was marked in red.
- Categorize: Gather all (major/olympic) sports to be part of this project
- RfCs: answer requests for comment

Chart

It would be great to get a scorigami chart into this article. LukeSurl^t c 14:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i second that!

also, why "origami" in the first place?

i like these kind of portmanteaus, but they need to be relevant words! what does origami have to do with ANYTHING here?! 2601:19C:527F:A660:B9FC:7AA9:5EA2:188 (talk) 22:12, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. The relevance needs to be explained. So far, it's just non-sensical, made-up word. Was it just "score" and "game" with stuff added so it sounded like something people would recognise as an existing word? Is it just a case of a clueless person doing stupid things? (The chart seems like a good idea, though. Relevant, even.) 84.250.167.255 (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a portmanteau of "score" and "origami". As Bois says in the very first line of the article on the Secret Base website and within ther first seconds of the video that launched the concept, its a word he made up. The name has stuck. It doesn't really make much sense, any origami connnection is tenuous to the point of non-existance. I can't see any sensible way of explaining it in the article because there's no real explanation. --LukeSurl^t c 20:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He explains the relation at the beginning of this video, although it's possible that was all something he made up after the term gained more traction. In any case, it's not completely unrelated. 2603:6011:5AF0:77F0:C1B:A0A8:5690:52DC (talk) 19:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

done -1ctinus📝🗨 12:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, I am working on one BigRed606 (talk) 07:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Year of creation

The article claims Jon Bois invented the term scorigami in 2016, but he has an article from 2014 about it (notably spelling it scoragami, with two a's). I did a few quick edits to the page, but I may have messed something up, and this might warrant some more major edits. NerdTheBox (talk) 21:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LukeSurl: how is tracking the latest scorigami considered "unencyclopedic" ?

In your latest revision of the article you deleted the tracker that obtains the recent scorigami. Is giving an example of the most recent example of something unencylopedic? Fair catch kick mentions the most recent example in the article, and is a good article. I am in favor of keeping the tracker. I am very new to Wikipedia so I would loved to see which rule it breaks in your opinion. -1ctinus📝🗨 17:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say "unencylopedic" in the edit summary so I'm not sure what you are quoting.

My issue with this is that including the most recent example creates a requirement to continually update the aricle, otherwise such a statement will become false. Its also hard to verify, as a citation can verify that a particular scorigami occured, but it cannot verify that no others have occured since. The reader is trusting that this article is checked and updated each week.

Overall though, I don't feel too strongly about this - it did seem to be kept up-to-date this season. If you want to add it back in I won't remove unless it seems to fall out-of-date. LukeSurl^t c 13:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why not just say something like "As of [date last updated] the most recent scorigami is [insert scorigami]"? NerdTheBox (talk) 19:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, strictly speaking this is original research if it's not published in a reliable source. Remsense诉 20:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there are reliable sources that report on this when it happens, somehow. i’ll re-add it but not with the twitter bot. -1ctinus📝🗨 00:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sept/15/2024 Major Edit

Hey! I'm currently doing a major edit on the article right now, and I'm opening up this space for discussion as I continue to edit (although I was originally going to add this after the major edit). Notes, added as I go along:

The HITC article is deviated, and the Wayback Machine and archive.today doesn’t seem to have any archives for the article. If someone can find something, do let me know.
In a lot of the articles that cover Scorigami, the term is typically used to refer to NFL American Football. This Wikipedia talks about Scorigami as a term used general in sports. While Scorigami is used in other sport areas, such as FIFA football, NHL Hockey, and baseball as covered in the article, coverage of Scorigami commonly pertain to the NFL.
@Remsense Pinging so as to give/clarify my personal reasoning for editing how I did in the prose.

Wobox25 (talk) 03:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right, so it's inappropriate to only treat it as an NFL concept if it's also used for other sports. Remsense ‥ 论 03:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The FIFA article and NHL article do recognize Scorigami as referring to scores in the NFL. ~~I am okay with also just saying "In American football" without the NFL emphasis.~~ I do think at least some indication of Scorigami referring to American football scores is needed rather than setting the basis that Scorigami is generally and commonly applied to all sports. Wobox25 (talk) 03:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, via the point above, the lone HITC article is deviated and I found other articles that are able to replace and still support what's said in the prose. Also also, the revert caused an edit conflict and certain repeated sources got messed up which I had to manually fix. Please don't do this, especially as I had put the Major Edit Banner up. I would've appreciated it if a talk topic got added instead and I was pinged.

I'm going to take down the Major Edit banner soon since I'm heading off to bed soon, but I will put it back up whenever I'm focusing on the article again, just as a headsup. Wobox25 (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will you continue to work on the article? -1ctinus📝🗨 14:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will in due time. College has to take priority, though. I did what I can with the free time I had, for now. Wobox25 (talk) 15:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Media Research and Analysis

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2024 and 2 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DrewR27 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by DrewR27 (talk) 21:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]