Talk:Sci Fiction

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Fair use rationale for Image:SciFi channel.svg

Image:SciFi channel.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not defunct

It doesn't appear to be defunct http://SciFiction.com

-- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Green Cardamom: http://SciFiction.com is a different site that is unrelated to http://www.scifi.com that had been hosting Sci Fiction. At present www.scifi.com redirects to http://www.syfy.com/scifi which offers video content. This article is about the short story "print" content that was curated and published by Ellen Datlow at http://www.scifi.com/scifiction/

There is a message on http://SciFiction.com with:

About this site

SciFiction.com has a rich history as a Hugo and Nebula award-winning SciFi literary project formerly owned by the SyFy Channel, and is now set to become the premiere destination for all things SciFi and beyond! SciFiction.com showcases geek-chic news, reviews, interviews, events and articles, and publishes the works of relevant artists and authors. SciFiction.com has over 60 thousand subscribers and is presently negotiating contracts with numerous top Hollywood studios to showcase and promote film and television projects along with exclusive actor interviews and behind the scenes journalism.^[1]

We are now getting into muddy territory. The old Sci Fiction at http://www.scifi.com/scifiction/ seems to have been notable or at least I don't see any attempts to delete this Wikipedia article on lack of notability grounds. This article makes the unsupported claim "At one time, it was the leading online science fiction magazine." Let's assume that was true and that the topic is notable.

http://SciFiction.com claims to have a relationship to the old Sci Fiction but it has none of the old stories previously hosted by Sci Fiction. http://www.scifi.com/scifiction/ redirects to http://www.syfy.com/scifi and not http://SciFiction.com. The new site is using the name "SciFiction.com" in its content without a space where the old content was under "Sci Fiction" with a space hosted by SciFi.com.

I suspect what we should do is to create a new article at SciFiction.com if, and only if, the topic is notable. As they seem to be unrelated efforts the new article can't WP:COATRACK content from/about Sci Fiction in an effort to be a notable topic.

At present there is a redirect from the Wikipedia topic Scifiction.com to Sci Fiction. There's no explanation for why this was added and so we don't know if it was added to deal with user confusion or if perhaps the scifi.com people also owned the scifiction.com domain name and had redirected it to http://www.scifi.com/scifiction/ If an article about SciFiction.com is added then I'd change the Scifiction.com article to either be a WP:DAB that references both the new article and this one or is a straight redirect to the new article which can {{also}} to this one. --Marc Kupper|talk 19:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sci Fiction short stories is not complete

At present the section "List of Sci Fiction short stories" lists

24 stories under "Originals" that appeared in the year 2000.
114 stories under "Classics" that appeared from May 2000 to to December 2005.

I see several issues with this:

Are these lists useful? I'll assume so as many of the entries are wiki-linked to articles about the stories and/or their authors.
The "Originals" list is incomplete in that it only covers the year 2000. About 200 original stories appeared in the webzine from 2001 through 2005 that are not mentioned/included in the article.
The "Originals" list for the year 2000 was incomplete as was missing two stories. I've added these:
- The Far Oasis by Jeffrey Ford published on October 25, 2000 [2]
- Chip Crockett's Christmas Carol by Elizabeth Hand published on December 6, 2000 [3]
The "Classics" list needs story-by-story double-checking as a list I constructed using one of the archived copies of the site lists 103 stories under "Classics".

As a full list from 2000 to 2005 would have over 300 stories I'm thinking we should show only what appeared in the year 2000 to give readers of this article a sense of what the webzine contained. It would allow us to keep the existing list of original stories, we'd delete the table rows for classic stories for the years 2001 to 2005, and would need to make sure the list for the year 2000 is accurate. --Marc Kupper|talk 21:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I support Marc's proposals, which seem reasonable. It would be good to have a complete list of the SciFiction stories available. --Pete Tillman (talk) 21:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]