This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This article was created or improved during the Geofocus: Countries beginning with 'I' edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in December 2018. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
User:SMBPiatt2020 (conflict of interest?) has added very non neutral content including "prolific and popular poet ", "was praised by prominent literary figures", "broke into the literary scene ", "George D. Prentice, the famous editor". Theroadislong (talk) 20:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:SMBPiatt2020’s edits have extended the lead section enormously, and included early life details for example, that really don’t belong there. The article is now looking strangely bloated. Their user name gives cause for some concern over a conflict of interest perhaps? Theroadislong (talk) 22:38, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
