Talk:Sant Muktabai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sant Muktabai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: Maharashtra / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Wrong name of this article

@Bonadea:, @David notMD: Per Times of India this factories' name is 'Sant Muktabai Sugar Factory'. But this article have other name, this name is also right but it is in Marathi, this is English WP & it's suppose to have English lang name. I suggest to change this article's title.Success think (talk) 11:09, 24 March 2022 (UTC) Source - [1].[reply]

Requested move 24 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page Not moved. (non-admin closure) _signed,511KeV ^(talk) 14:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sant Muktabai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana → Sant Muktai Sugar factory – As per Times of India and other reliable secondary sources, which are in reference sect of this page, this factory's English name is 'Sant Muktai Sugar factory'. Success think (talk) 13:13, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I don't see a clear case for this change. Five of the references are in English, and only one of them uses the proposed name:

Ref 1 (Bloomberg) calls it "Sant Muktai Sugar & Energy Ltd".

Ref 2 (Times of India) calls it "Sant Muktabai sugar factory".

Ref 8 (Times of India) calls it "Sant Muktabai SSK Ltd".

Ref 9 (Economic Times) calls it "Sant Muktabai SSK".

Ref 10 (News Today) calls it "Sant Muktai Sugar Factory".

A Google search for "Sant Muktai" sugar returns 1820 results while a search for "Sant Muktabai" sugar returns 7280 results, so the current name "Muktai" seems to be used significantly more than the proposed name "Muktabai". CodeTalker (talk) 17:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support @CodeTalker:, Hello, per Economic Times article, this factorie's name is SANT MUKTAI SUGAR & ENERGY LIMITED and not the 'Sant Muktabai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana' which is in non-Eng lang. I dont what's its meaning really.[ https://m.economictimes.com/company/sant-muktai-sugar-energy-limited/U15422PN2013PLC147067],Lokmat saying it Muktai Suagar Factory. This Maharashtra give web calling it, Sant Muktai co-operative (Sahakari) Sugar Factory'.Success think (talk) 04:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Success think, you cannot support your own nomination as per WP:RMCOMMENT! It says: Nomination already implies that the nominator supports the name change, and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted line. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 04:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The user who proposed this move has been banned for socking. This move seems to be a moot point now, so non-admin closure should be done? Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 23:29, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.