A fact from San Miguel Church (Manila) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 December 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
San Miguel Church (Manila) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose Contesting above move request, as commas only apply to country subdivision placenames and not buildings and structures which are normally disambiguated using parentheses as with other articles on buildings and structures in the Philippines. This needs a full discussion.--RioHondo (talk) 17:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Location being disambiguated by commas are also not part of the name as well. Again, giving self-made examples to illustrate a point cannot be a basis to defy rules. Some example you gave are only situated in America, Canada, and Australia and does not represent other parts of the world, where the Philippines belongs to. Freemasons are different from churches. Still, there are more churches being disambiguated by commas than parenthesis and there is already a rule that should be followed. --Anime (talk) 04:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This tends to vary by country. For Commonwealth countries (except Canada) we do generally use comma disambiguation for buildings (most buildings in Australia actually do use this style). North America, however, uses parenthetical disambiguation. There is no hard and fast rule. We're usually guided by other similar articles referring to the same country. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, The Philippines traditionally follows North American examples, specifically US example, like with MOS:ENGVAR and our mosplace is also patterned after WP:USPLACE. So this shouldn't be different.--RioHondo (talk) 14:51, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.