Talk:Samma (tribe)

Pakistan: Sindh Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sindh.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

first don't mention as muslim jat because they were not muslim...were hindu...that traced to jam not jat....

Let us upgrade

For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 03:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jamot, Samma, Sammat, Jam

This article says Samma is a division of Jamot. Is this correct? If so, is Abro a division of Samma or of Jamot? Aymatth2 (talk) 13:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC) Samma are title as Jam means Sardar or Chief. Jamot is the titular name of Samma. Jamot are the descendents of Samma, Abro is also descendent of Samma tribe or Sammat.--Jogi don (talk) 11:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

The following list of uncited alleged sources have been removed from the article. If they're of any use then please do reinstate them after reading WP:Citing sources. I've struck through the ones that are definitely not reliable (mostly Raj stuff) or otherwise unsuitable (Flickr, for example).

* Baluchistan - Imperial Gazetteer of India, v. 6, p. 277.

~~History of Jamot Tribes~~
Kingdom of Sammas by Gulam Mohammad Lakho

* The Chach Nama- English translation by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg. Delhi Reprint, 1979.

~~Tarikh-i Hind Wa Sindh, Arabic (تاريخ الهند والسند )~~

~~The tomb of Jam Nido at Makli Hills, Thatta, Sindh, Pakistan - March 2008~~
Makli Necropolis
Makli graveyard - telling tales of centuries
A new archaeological discovery in Lasbela

* [Jam Nizam-ud-din's] Tomb at Thatta</s?

Call to save crumbling Samma heritage

Islamic culture - Page 429, by Islamic Culture Board
* A History of India Under the Two First Sovereigns of the House of Taimur, by William Erskine
The History and culture of the Indian people - Page 224, by Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Bhāratīya Itihāsa Samiti

The Ṭabaqāt-i-Akbarī of K̲h̲wājah Nizāmuddīn Ahmad: a history of India, by Niẓām al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad Muqīm, Brajendranath De, Baini Prashad

Bibliotheca Indica - Page 778, by Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal, Asiatic Society (Calcutta, India)

Searchlights on Baloches and Balochistan, by Mir Khuda Bakhsh Marri

The Delhi Sultanate, by Kanaiyalal Maneklal Munshi, Ramesh Chandra Majumdar, Asoke Kumar Majumdar, A. D. Pusalker

Babar, by Radhey Shyam

Indo-Arab relations: an English rendering of Arab oʾ Hind ke taʾllugat, by Syed Sulaiman Nadvi, Sayyid Sulaimān Nadvī, M. Salahuddin
* The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians: The Muhammadan Period, by Henry Miers Elliot, John Dowson
Muslim Kingship in India, by Nagendra Kumar Singh

The Indus Delta country: a memoir, chiefly on its ancient geography and history, by Malcolm Robert Haig

The Samma kingdom of Sindh: historical studies, by G̲h̲ulāmu Muḥammadu Lākho, University of Sind. Institute of Sindology
* Imperial Gazetteer of India, by William Wilson Hunter, James Sutherland Cotton, Richard Burn, William Stevenson Meyer, Great Britain. India Office, John George Bartholomew - Sitush (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Kindly insert the information in this article Samma tribe.
[edit]
Samma are the Sindhi Rajput clan of Rajput, settled in Sindh,Balochistan, Rajasthan India. They established the Samma Dynasty, Under Jam Nizamudin. there are information on Google books regarding Samma tribe. kindly insert information for this article.--Jogi don (talk) 11:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am thinking that this article should be redirected to the dynasty article. I am struggling to find any decent sources that even mention this community as a modern-day tribe - everything seems to relate to 700 years ago etc. The problem is that ancient dynasties do not always in fact connect to modern tribes, except in the mythology of the modern tribes themselves. A classic is the Yadav vs Yadava thing; another is the Vanniyar, whose convoluted myth of origin connects them to the Kodava even though all academic sources say otherwise. - Sitush (talk) 11:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Satush, You rightly said that Samma tribe may be 700 years old,now Samma tribe also referred as SAMMAT. the Samma tribe now is dispersed into many sub-castes which are now got full status of caste, such as Unar (This was a person name whose descendant are called Unar caste/tribe.), Abro, Rajpar, Bhatti, Buriro, Chutta, Jadeja, Junejo, Jokhio, Narejo, Lakhan. "Two main Rajput tribes of Sind are: the Samma, a branch of the Yadav Rajputs who inhabit the eastern and lower Sind and Bahawalpur; and the Sumra who, according to the 1907 edition of the Gazetteer are a branch of the Parwar Rajputs. Among others are the Bhuttos, Bhattis, Lakha, Sahetas, Lohanas, Mohano, Dahars, Indhar, Chachar, Dhareja, Rathors, Dakhan, Langah etc.4 The Mohano tribe is spread over Makran, Sind and southern Punjab. They are also identified with the ‘Mallah’ of the Punjab and both have in common a sub-section called Manjari. All these, old Sindhi tribes are known under the common nomenclature of Sammat." see this paragraph in THis site and this site World Public Library. and this origin of SAMMAT .--Jogi don (talk) 06:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Samma are originally Lohana, an ancient kshatriya

Accroding to [Chachnama]] there was a powerful king name Agham Lohana. there were many subtiribe of Lohanas like Lakha, Samma, Sahata, Kotak, Channa(Chhanna) and many more mentioned in the Chachnama.[1]] In chachnama Wazír Siyákar replied in the presence of Mókah Basáyeh: “In the reign of Rái Chach the Lúhánahs, that is, the Lákháhs and the Sammáhs.[2] Also historians Chintaman Vinayak Vaidya confirmed that the Sammas were Lohanas and originally kshatriya.[3]]. That's why the Sammas were belong to Lohanas and after arab they established their kingdom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.229.29.74 (talk) 06:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samma is Not MuslimJat

Samma are originally Muslim Sandhi Muslim (talk) 06:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Origin and Establishment

According to Chachnama, Samma was a branch of Lohana tribe.^[1] Ala al-Din Khiljl (1296-1316) mounted a number of campaigns in the region battling the Sumra princes whose cycle of capitulation/rebellion could be charted exactly to the perceived military stress on the metropole. Yet, the Delhi Sultans and their governor rarely resorted to invading Sumra held territories - relying, instead, on alliances with tribal elite and local power struggles. Against the Sumras, Khiljl advanced the cause of the Lohana tribe of Samma. The conflict guaranteed a rolling supply of princes and tribal chiefs wanting alliances with the center. The tussle for dominance between the Sumras and the Samma lasted until the reign of Firuz Shah Tughluq (1351- 1388), when the Jam emirs of Samma were finally able to end Sumra dominance, taking over lower Sindh.^[2]

References

^ Elliot, Henry M. (1867). The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians: The Muhammadan Period Vol. I - page - 362. Trubner & Co., London.
^ Ahmed, Manan (2008). The many histories of Muhammad b. Qasim: Narrating the Muslim conquest of Sindh - page - 99. The University of Chicago.

Lead reference

The references added in the lead written by Sigrid-Hellbusch seems to have a very bad review here [[4]] on page 938 first-two para, and it doesn't look like in the reference writer is saying the lines that has been added here, most writers seems to have taken a very ambiguous stance. Akalanka820 (talk) 09:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Jam Unar Samma.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 April 2024

Admin @Daniel Case, Please remove unsourced claims. The Sammas are also said to be the descendants of Samba son of Shree Krishna. it is factually wrong no historical inscription/book/ records says any connection between Muslim sammas and Hindu god Krishna. 2409:4085:8E8D:162F:0:0:8809:2D11 (talk) 09:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source here it's mentioned Samma's are descended from Shri Krishna's son Samba Rajanyas (talk) 09:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This source is not reliable. 2409:4085:8E8D:162F:0:0:8809:2D11 (talk) 10:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it doesn't fall under any unreliable category. Stop POV pushing Rajanyas (talk) 11:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Elliot, Henry M. (1867). The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians: The Muhammadan Period Vol. I - page - 362. Trubner & Co., London.

[2] Ahmed, Manan (2008). The many histories of Muhammad b. Qasim: Narrating the Muslim conquest of Sindh - page - 99. The University of Chicago.

[1]

[2]