Talk:Samba de Amigo
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Samba de Amigo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Samba de Amigo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
New article for the Song List?
[edit]I would say, since the game will have downloadable content, and will thus cause the list to grow more expansive as time goes on, it may be time to split it off onto its own page. What do y'all think? That seems to be the standard for all the other rhythm games, now that I look around, so it may be a given. --SuperHappy (talk) 09:45, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- It seems to be a pretty long list at list point, and it'll only get longer, so I'd agree. Kuro ♪ 20:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Los Del Rio vs. Los Del Mar
[edit]- This is the Los Del Rio version of Macarena - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9z7t-Ox3XvU
- This is the Los Del Mar version of Macarena - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ2hqQWIx64
- This is the version of Macarena in Samba de Amigo - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCYhvAGJ0Eo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.83.134.172 (talk) 20:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Wii game split
[edit]Do we need to discuss whether we want to split this article or not, or can we just go ahead and do it? The Wii section seems long enough to have it's own page. MF14 (talk) 01:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- I would say that Ver.2000, the Wii version, and the song list should all get their own pages, complete with a menu box to go on the bottom of each page. I wonder if the importance of the game series would be called into question though. Maybe we should wait until we see how the Wii version performs? To be honest, I still don't have a clear idea how Wikipedia measures such things. --SuperHappy (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with SuperHappy. Samba de Amigo Ver.2000 and Samba de Amigo Wii should get separate articles aside from the original Samba de Amigo. Both games are sequels that somewhat expand the original game in certain fields, even if being graphically similar. We can call this a series for sure. (Mr Wesker (talk) 01:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC))
- I would say that Ver.2000, the Wii version, and the song list should all get their own pages, complete with a menu box to go on the bottom of each page. I wonder if the importance of the game series would be called into question though. Maybe we should wait until we see how the Wii version performs? To be honest, I still don't have a clear idea how Wikipedia measures such things. --SuperHappy (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Don't know if Wikipedia has a policy in place tocover situations like this. From what I've seen, remakes a generally go on the same page as the original, e.g. Resident Evil (video game) but I have seen exceptions.Mr T (Based) (talk) 13:41, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- How come we should call this a remake instead of a sequel? (Mr Wesker (talk) 01:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC))
- Er, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 etc etc. I've seen it called a remake, an update and so on but not a sequel.Mr T (Based) (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'd have to argue otherwise as this is a style of game that any sequel would likely only have the new gifts of songs and improved graphics, the Wii version at the very least has this, plus many new features, and as far as I am concerned definitely should be considered a sequel worthy of it's own page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.227.156.62 (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Er, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 etc etc. I've seen it called a remake, an update and so on but not a sequel.Mr T (Based) (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- How come we should call this a remake instead of a sequel? (Mr Wesker (talk) 01:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC))
Split declined. The material is relevant and pertinent to this article. SilkTork *YES! 22:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
This article has old old info ... suggest breaking Wii section off to new article. 99.60.126.50 (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Split declined. The material is relevant and pertinent to this article. SilkTork *YES! 22:23, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Samba de Amigo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.sega.co.uk/sambadeamigo/en/minigame/index.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040805135659/http://www.igda.org/awards/archive_2001.htm to http://www.igda.org/awards/archive_2001.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100625052429/http://www.sega.com/sambadeamigo/ to http://www.sega.com/sambadeamigo/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 11 December 2017 (UTC)