Jump to content

Talk:Salman of Saudi Arabia/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:Saudi-logo.jpg

Image:Saudi-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

This issue was resolved a while ago. (Mni9791 (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2011 (UTC))

Currently passed away?

"He is married to Princess Sultana who has currently passed away."

I hate to tell you, but she is not going to come back from being "passed away". Tad Lincoln (talk) 06:32, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of health subsection

His health status includes sourced content, but it was deleted twice and fixed. Please do not delete it without discussing here. Thanks.Egeymi (talk) 07:43, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Today, 16 June 2012

Today I have learnt that Prince Salman has many pages in Wikipedia written in other languages. I wish such additions have been done long before Prince Nayef's death.Egeymi (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Infobox

Only the 'King' reigns, in Saudi Arabia. Therefore could somebody fix the infobox so that reign is replaced with tenure? GoodDay (talk) 22:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

A person
File:HRHKSALMAN.jpg
A waxwork

Date of succession

UTC says January 22, 2015, where's Saudi time says January 23, 2015. Which are we going by folks? GoodDay (talk) 05:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Wouldn't it make sense to use local time? I'm too sleepy to look myself, but I assume the WP:MOS has something for this. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 3 Shevat 5775 08:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Unification of name

Salman / Sulayman is intertwined in the article; I thought MOS somewhere say that it should not be the case? (I myself had to double-check when Sulayman came later in the article). Either that, or the name Sulayman should be more prominently mentioned (since the place it is introduced is right after the written Arabic name and inside parentheses). - Penwhale | dance in the air and follow his steps 19:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

The english version is Salman, which is also used in his sons article titles. Let's stick with Salman, less we want 'red links'. GoodDay (talk) 20:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
The Sulayamān isn't present in the Arabic name either. The character, ي, is required to form the diphthong present in the name Sulayamān: سليمان . Salman is سلمان. The Semitic root is the same, but they're different names. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 3 Shevat 5775 22:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Styles box inconsistency

The styles of King Salman box under King of Saudi Arabia pits his style as your majesty, but everything else says he is addressed as Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques instead of Your Majesty. Am I missing something or is this just an oversight where an editor might have thought the default Your Majesty is appropriate because he's a king? Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 4 Shevat 5775 17:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

It's unsourced, so I've removed it. DrKay (talk) 17:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Wouldn't it make more sense just to change it to the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques rather than removing it all-together? Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 4 Shevat 5775 18:04, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't find anything about him being Custodian instead of Your Majesty at the source cited either, so I've also removed that. I imagine it's one of his subsidiary titles, like Elizabeth II is Supreme Governor of the Church of England, but people don't actually call her that as an alternative style or commonly. DrKay (talk) 18:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
It's actually his primary title, but you're absolutely right that we need a source to find out if he's actually addressed that way. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 5 Shevat 5775 18:23, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Salman of Saudi Arabia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yerevani Axjik (talk · contribs) 02:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)


1. Well-written: ✗ Fail

a. the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
Explanation

The text jumps here and there. It says he was deputy governor of Riyadh in 1954, and just a sentence later the article is talking about the year 1964 and him being governor of the province. It doesn't say much about his governorship, even though he held the office for 48 years. His foreign visits are actually less important. The article should of have focus more on his internal politics, as he was a governor, not a king or a foreign minister. The whole section about his governorship needs to be seriously expanded in order for this article to get the GA status.

The section about his early life is far worse. The article says almost nothing about his youth.

The section about Salman's position as deputy crown prince is, as it seems, a speculation. The article doesn't say who speculates, so what we have there is just a gossip. And again, the prose is hard to follow, as text jumps from a year to a year, so it looks more like a chronology rather then a biographical article.

The section about Salman being a crown prince is decent, though much more can be written, especially about his philanthropic activity, for example in Bosnia and Herzegovina (in 1990s, way before he become a crown prince, which article doesn't mention at all).

The section about his kingship is ok. Though, templates for references (such as "cite news" or "cite web") should be used. The Early reforms subsections is missing a reference for the last claim.

In sections about his "views" and personal life, Wikileaks shouldn't be used as a reference. The rest seems to be ok.

2. Verifiable with no original research ✗ Fail

a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
b. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and
c. it contains no original research
Explanation

Sources such as Wikileaks aren't reliable. Also, the article was entirely writen based on news reports. Which would be ok, but much literature can be found that deals with Salman's biography. So better sources can be used.

3. Broad in its coverage: ✗ Fail

a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
Explanation

The article failed to address the main aspects of Salman's biography. For example, nothing is mentioned about his controversial charity work in Bosnia and Herzegovina in the 1990s. Or, it doesn't really say much about important parts of his biography. For example, the article says: "He favored political and economic relationships with the West". The sentence doesn't really say much, like how did he favored political and economic relationship with the West, or where did these good relations with the west realised.

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each. ✓ Pass

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. ✓ Pass

6. Illustrated, if possible, by images ✓ Pass

a. images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
b. images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Overall: ✗ Fail

--Yerevani Axjik (talk) 02:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Disputed

Is that picture of a real person or a waxwork? DrKay (talk) 10:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Photoshopped official photo? --RicHard-59 (talk) 00:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Majlis al-Uthra?

Shouldn't that be Majlis al-Usra? I can't find it in arabic anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:846:C000:61E5:0:0:0:E5C0 (talk) 03:18, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Neutral wording for the 47 executions

"Among the most notable events during his reign so far have been... and the execution of Nimr al-Nimr and 46 others opponents of the regime on 2 January 2016." The 47 executions were carried upon charges of terrorism. The majority of the 47 people were al-Qaeda members, not just "opponents of the regime." The main identifier of the 47 people is the terrorism charge. I suggest rephrasing the sentence above so that it reflects this nature of the executions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by O. Albaity (talk • contribs) 20:50, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

'Panama Papers revelations' fabrication

The 'Panama Papers revelations' section of this article claims King Salman gave $80,000,000 to finance Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's election campaign. This was confirmed to have been fabricated (as seen in citation 53), yet it remains in this article. For the sake of accuracy this needs to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.216.91.210 (talk) 18:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit request 18 June 2016

Can we link where it says Sultan in the infobox to Sultan bin Salman Al Saud 62.64.152.154 (talk) 20:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Done. DrKay (talk) 20:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Others sons of his that have articles include Fahd bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, Faisal bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, and Turki bin Salman Al Saud. Can we link those in the infobox too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:300:C930:D5DC:3BE7:A24E:AE51 (talk) 19:36, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 July 2016

Apparently the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia is considered the heir apparent. Can you change the header for heirs in the info box from "heir presumptive" to "heir apparent"?

50.205.119.111 (talk) 17:33, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 17:36, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

The article on heirs apparent listed the Saudi Arabian Crown Prince as a heir apparent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:300:C930:2C2E:C97D:2562:F1D2 (talk) 01:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

These articles refer to the Crown Prince as heir apparent. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/saudiarabia/9339369/Prince-Salman-appointed-Saudi-Arabia-heir-apparent.html.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/saudi-arabias-king-salman-replaces-crown-prince-foreign-minister-1430278377 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:300:C930:2C2E:C97D:2562:F1D2 (talk) 01:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. nyuszika7h (talk) 07:35, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Assassination plot

Malaysia on Tuesday said suspected militants from Yemen arrested late last month ahead of a visit by Saudi King Salman were planning an attack on "Arab royalties".
Reuters:Malaysia says foiled attack on Arab royalty ahead of Saudi king's visit
Financial Times:Malaysia says it foiled attack on Saudi king in Kuala Lumpur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qrmoo3 (talk • contribs) 10:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Salman of Saudi Arabia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-saudi-politics-idUSKBN0NK05W20150429. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Salman of Saudi Arabia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Ahrar Al-Sham in Al-Qaeda section

why is Ahrar Al-Sham in Al-Qaeda section,when most western analytics say that Ahrar Al-Sham is turkish influenced and not a part of Al-Qaeda.Alhanuty (talk) 21:46, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Sons and daughters.

12 sons and 1 daughter? --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii 22:13, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

@Sidoroff-B: Any references? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
@Emir of Wikipedia: I mean, that's what I counted on the page. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii 18:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
@Sidoroff-B: That seems to match Datarabia. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 09:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Controversy Section Neutrality

This entire section is based on one citation, from a source that seems to be a non-neutral POV. The source gives few sources to its claims and has published biased or downright false articles about the royal family and Saudi government. Is this section necessary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.34.243 (talk) 23:09, 26 September 2017‎

I agree with the above post by 71.112.34.243 (talk). The source of this false report is very anti-Saudi; see WP:NPOV. John N Smith (talk) 10:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Other positions

shouldn't we add the other positions he had before becomeing king in the info box the same think was done for his son — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.176.190.67 (talk)

What other positions? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:33, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

He was Second Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defence as well as govenor of Riyadh

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Salman of Saudi Arabia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Salman of Saudi Arabia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Good article

This currently has an orange level tag on it. This means it is a candidate for a immediate fail. Can this be resolved soon please. AIRcorn (talk) 03:52, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Salman of Saudi Arabia/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WPCW (talk · contribs) 21:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The article received a good article nomination on the 10th January 2018. In March 2018, a factual accuracy dispute template was placed in the Crown Prince section. An editor commented on the talk page on the 11th of May 2018 that the template would lead to an immediate fail during a Good Article Review. At the time of this review, that template was still showing in the article. The comments on the template are unaddressed by either a change in the article content or through a discussion on the talk page. The comments on the template appear valid and require further work.

The presence of the unaddressed factual accuracy dispute means that on this occasion the article fails to meet the good article criteria. WPCW (talk) 22:47, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Infobox

shouldn't we add to the infobox that he was govenor of riyad — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.55.23.143 (talk) 14:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Why? He isn't any longer and no other previous roles are mentioned in the infoboxHeliotom (talk) 17:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
I think this is a good idea, why not? Hddty. (talk) 02:45, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

What is the problem with this image?

File:Salman of Saudi Arabia 1017260103-1-1.jpg

This image I saw a number of users who do not like this photo, it have been removed from the article and; I have added an image that did not violate the copyright. This image of King Salman is the best image at all, it is highlight the features of King Salman with, clear background and good sides. Zozr789 (talk) 18:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

"This image of King Salman is the best image at all". Zozr789 is there any conflict of interest? Knightrises10 (talk) 18:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
I did not praise myself but, I said that it is among the most beautiful pictures! This to remind you only a personal point of view. I am not proud of myself, but I see you who hate this image and do not want to be published. Zozr789 (talk) 19:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
@Zozr789: Why would I hate the photo? And we do not see if a photo is beautiful or not. Read WP:IUP#COPYRIGHT. And may I know what you mean by saying "I did not praise myself...I am not proud of myself'. The discussion didn't talk about you. Knightrises10 (talk) 19:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
@Knightrises10 Calm down, you said that the discussion page does not talk about me, so what is your problem with me? You said I was proud of myself and I told you that I was not proud of myself. Zozr789 (talk) 19:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Can you please use this image?

hi guys, this is the best "Public domain" image of King Salman in my opinion, It's being used in the Arabic Wikipedia article. So can you please use it here?

--Mohmd1429 (talk) 20:22, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed new sections on later government reform and humanitarian organization

I've drafted two new sections here covering recent government reforms as well as his humanitarian outfit KSRelief. These could be added to the King of Saudi Arabia section – one after the Crown Prince change section, titled ‘Later reforms’, and another after the Panama Papers revelations section, titled ‘KSRelief’. If someone could review these that'd be much appreciated. Tarafa15 (talk) 15:35, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit protected}} template. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:15, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
@Knightrises10: do you mind taking a look at the two sections I’ve proposed here? If not can you think of anyone else who might? This doesn’t look like a very active talk page. Thanks. Tarafa15 (talk) 13:50, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Tarafa15. I believe that these sections can be added on the article, as they are properly sourced. However, at the moment, the page is fully protected and can only edited by the admins. So, MSGJ, can you tell us if it can possible to add these sections? Thanks, Knightrises10 (talk) 14:23, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

'Al-Qaeda' section

The Al-Qaeda section is in fact about Saudi Arabia’s backing of the Army of Conquest, which "reportedly included an Al-Qaeda linked al-Nusra Front". It doesn't make sense for this section to be titled 'Al-Qaeda'.

As there is already a section on Iran and Syria, I propose the two sentences currently under 'Al-Qaeda' are added to the 'Iran and Syria' section as a second paragraph, and the Al-Qaeda heading is removed.Tarafa15 (talk) 13:04, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Reply 08-DEC-2018

  Edit request implemented  

  1. All three references for this claim emphasized the affiliative nature of one of the groups whose members are a part of the coalition known as the Army of Conquest. That affiliate group has links to Al-Qaeda. But the Army of Conquest is made up of many other members who were not part of the group affiliated with Al-Qaeda. The subheading is thus pars pro toto, in that it is using a part of the coalition to describe its whole, which it should not be doing, for the sake of clarity.
  2. There is already an Iran and Syria subheading where information in the section in question would be more appropriately placed, seeing as how the information pertains to groups fighting in Syria. The information has been moved to that subheading.

Regards,  Spintendo  18:07, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

@Spintendo: thanks very much for looking at this. Tarafa15 (talk) 15:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Wahhabi?

The "Religion" listed in the infobox (with |religion=) has gone back and forth from including Wahhabi and Hanbali prefixes to Sunni Islam (last at this version) to neither (here) and then just Wahhabi (here), reverted by Jaseromer (here) with the summary there is no such a religion called 'Wahhabi'. I'll note that Abdullah of Saudi Arabia includes both terms, cited, in the infobox, and that various divisions/practices/denominations/sects are often included in this parm when relevant (i.e. this edit summary does not seem to be a valid objection).

I recognize that it's the subject of some controversy in this case, and this might be a good reason to remove religion from the infobox entirely here, though it might be conspicuous by it's absence (i.e., are we saying, by it's absence, that he may not be as tied to Wahhabism as his predecessors?). The article body contains no reference to his religion.

There was discussion here about removal of the parm entirely from infoboxes as a constant source of strife, though this apparently has not happened.

Should religion stay in the infobox and, if so, would someone familiar with the subject like to cite RSs we can lean on in the future? Searches turn up lots of op-ed, conjecture, and provocative-sounding titles. Someone more familiar with the area might hopefully be able to sort it out (if possible). —[AlanM1(talk)]— 11:06, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

I've removed it in the spirit of the RfC: Religion in biographical infoboxes and noting that it's been removed from some other related infoboxes used by BLPs. It can be mentioned in the body of the article but as always needs reliable sources. Doug Weller talk 14:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

NPOV

Improvements need to be made to the article. There are numerous statements similar to "His son, Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, is a powerful figure within Saudi Arabia and has led many reforms within the country," that need to be addressed. Zkidwiki (talk) 02:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

30s ?

Salman in his 30s

this picture says "salman in his 30s", but he born in 1935 ? how does than can be true ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.48.31.57 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Answer: The English term “in his 30s” refers to his age, not the calendar year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WanderingEngineer (talk • contribs) 13:45, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Just to help those who may not be native English speakers, when we say "in his thirties" then we mean his age between 30 and 39. When we say "in the Thirties" then we are talking about the years that are numbered the 30s (in this case the 1930s). --Eliyahu S Talk 22:08, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

03226815235

Muhammad zubair please help Muhammad salman arshad (talk) 09:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Title of Prime Minster from the Infobox

Since the reign of King Faisal, the Prime Minister is is the King. Even in official briefings by the Saudi Press Agency, the 'King' is referred as the Head of the Council of Minister. So it is an understood fact and so I think the title of the Prime Minister should be removed from the info box Jibran1998 (talk) 22:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Name

Why are names for saudi kings salman of saudi arabia, abdullah of saudi arabia etc. while other arab kings have just their name on wikipedia like qaboos bin said??? Billythekidgun (talk) 10:20, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Mashaallah sar king bin salman ser

Ok sar 37.111.243.36 (talk) 13:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Not to be confused with King Salmon or Solomon.

Is this disclaimer really necessary? It gave me a good chuckle but I think it isn't realistically preventing any confusion or serving any purpose rather than being comedic. Aalswais (talk) 00:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Abdullah.os son's.1977/10/10ocen cholden

Where musanaxt06/11/2023 Md.nizamuddin7080@emil. 58.145.188.244 (talk) 02:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Salman_of_Saudi_Arabia/Archive_1&oldid=1241137671"