Talk:Saint-Lambert station

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

This article lacks references.

Canada: Quebec Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.

Montreal Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Intro

Per the RFC on station leads, the consensus is to include the word "station" in the introductory mention. If it makes the rest of the sentence wonky, we can reword it, but I don't think that's true here; at any rate "Saint-Lambert station is a railway station" is different from "Saint-Lambert station is a station". The edit also makes the first sentence excessively long, and introduced some errors.--Cúchullain ^t/c 04:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There you go! Just station without redundancy. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. Thanks, Secondarywaltz--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]