Talk:SR U class

SR U class has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 17, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

Trains: in UK / Locomotives Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 23, 2008

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

GA review

My checklist:

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail:

A few comments before I feel like I should pass this.

See WP:UNITS - a non-breaking space should be added between values and units (i.e. add a between 2 and kg for 2 kg).
What does "mogul" mean in this context?
Spelling mistakes - I've corrected all I found, but please spell check in future before nominating.
Date or page ranges need to be delineated with en-dash (see WP:DASH).

~~I don't quite see what the problem is concerning delineation, unless you have already corrected this~~.--Bulleid Pacific 22:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please attend to these and I'll move the article from being on hold to pass. The Rambling Man 17:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, still a few MOS issues which I've now resolved myself (e.g. en-dashes, etc) so I'll move this to GA now. The Rambling Man 17:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]