Talk:SPICA (spacecraft)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Update
[edit]I don't really have time to run through it, but if anyone is interested - here are some documents:
- updating progress on SPICA up to September 2014: http://casca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SPICA_WP_MTR.pdf
- January 2015: http://cor.gsfc.nasa.gov/copag/aas_jan2015/SPICA_COPAG_4Jan2015.pdf (go to slide 6)
- April 2015: http://www.lra.ens.fr/~levrier/Files/SPICA-SAFARI-2015.05.04.pdf
SkywalkerPL (talk) 14:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
If not M5 then is SPICA concept dead
[edit]ESA or JAXA can't afford to develop it for the M5 mission. Now what happens ? Will it look for more funds or get redesigned for lower cost ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Probably nothing further will happen. It is possible to revive the project if it still is scientifically valuable, but it will take a decade at least and probably all the instruments will need redesign then. It is also possible that the planned instruments will find their way onto other projects.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 08:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class spaceflight articles
- Unknown-importance spaceflight articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Moon articles
- Low-importance Moon articles
- Moon task force articles
- Start-Class Solar System articles
- Low-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force
- Start-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles