Talk:SMS Brummer (1884)

SMS Brummer (1884) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 25, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / European / German

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Brummer (1884)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 11:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 16:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments

"After a lengthy period in reserve, she joined the gunnery training school". 1. Is it known when this happened? 2, Could it be mentioned in the main article.
- Clarified in both places - this was in 1892
The division leader image needs a US PD tag.
- Added
Any chance you could email me a copy of Hildebrande et al Vol 2 page 147? Thanks.
- No problem at all.
  - Except I don't think I have your email! If you email me, I'll send it over. Parsecboy (talk) 19:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sent. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should have it, let me know if it didn't go. Parsecboy (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"a platform was built was installed aft"?
- Whoops!

Checks

Passes Earwig.
Sources look solid to me.
Images are appropriately tagged.
My German is rubbish, but several spot checks came up positive.

Gog the Mild (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great stuff. That was easy. A nice little article. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]